عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]چکیده [English]
As that we know for corrupt or void contract never can not recognition at credit world. In the event that become clear a contract is corrupt,when not exchanged object of transaction between contracting parties is obvious that with become clear corruption contract not need to this action, but when exchanged object transaction must become restoration to home owner because corrupt contract not effect at the ownershipeor creation commitment and legal relationship (article 365 civil law) and not validity never alienate and commitment except at the scope law.
Intended purpose from a corrupt contract that will be case study is legal relations the parties than suretyship, is a commutative contract that sxchange res against res or act against res is pillar peoducer it.
In this article will be case study is legal relations contracting parties at commutative contracts in case of corruption and case study the concept corruption and the documentation of arbiter suretyship at Imamia and Sunni jurisprudence.