عنوان مقاله [English]
The futures contract has been widely welcomed by investors in the field of coin transactions in recent years. Because the seller pledges to the buyer at a specified time to sell the amount of the coin to the buyer at the price specified at the moment of concluding the contract and the buyer pledges to buy the coin with the same specifications. But in this type of contract, the "Thomson Fillman" bill is not available for timing, and also "pre-maturity sale" is possible by obtaining a sales position by the customer. Also, in this type of contract there is a "probability of profit and loss" equally, similar to the "gambling contract". The question arises; is this type of contract invalid from legal and legal point of view? The result of this paper suggests that the future contract entitled "Contrat aleatoire" in French civil law is correct and by examining in the words of the Imams "jurisprudents" in accordance with Islamic law and Islamic law "and the issue of" the necessity of bills of money for Muslims " And "the prohibition of pre-maturity sale" is based on the well-known jurists' ijtihad and expediency. Also, "gambling" in the jurisprudence is "gambling with gambling". But the "concept of the game" does not matter in futures contracts, and the "futures system" is not similar to "gambling devices."